"Will Draw Comics for Food"

Hello again!

As some of you may remember, I asked for support for my comic back August. I was ecstatic with all the help and support that I got: about fifty people, including some people that heard about the comic via advertising and hearsay, joined the comic’s facebook fan page. People purchased items at the store. Finally, I received nearly twice the hoped for advertising budget via donations. This money was put to good use at both facebook and at topwebcomics.com

And I can’t wait for it grow. Recently, I have submitted some fan art to one of my favorite comics ever. I even finally found (thanks to those of you on tweb) another comic about quarter life Christianity over here! I’ve constructed new banner ads, and updated the comic page. (so I guess I’m not the only “Christian Webcomics” around) Soon there will even be one of those annoying “which _____ character are you?” facebook quizzes floating around!

But I still need support. Here are some ways, for those of you who like the comic and/or like me.

Guest Comics This is by far the most important way that you can help the comic. During December, I usually take a break to queue up the comic and more importantly enjoy advent. My comic is building some momentum, so I hope not to have a huge blank space in the updates. This is why I hope I can get a dozen comics sent in. It’s been done before.

Naturally, anyone who does a guest comic will have a permanent link to anything they want on the page –err within reason. I’m not doing your porn-cam.

I don’t care if you feel like you can’t draw (neither can I), if you don’t think you are funny, or even if you can only do “fan art” instead of a full comic. Just make something fun with my characters as a guest strip. I don’t care if I haven’t met you yet. In fact, it feels great to get fan strips from people I don’t know in real life. Cross-overs with comics are also fun.

Dig it and Stumble it Those of you who are familiar with sites like stumbleupon and digg can plug this blog at those sites. I am sure there are dozens of other sites like this out there. Every bit of exposure helps.

Finally, there is of course this:








Donate as much as you can. I hope for a $250 dollar average from each person donating. No, just kidding. I’ll probably get something like 5-20 from each person. Once again, if you donate $15 or more you will be forever immortalized in the comic as a character in the background. You can check out the facebook group to see who is already there.

This money will go into advertising the comic and towards support the two world vision kids that I support monthly.

Thank you for your support, and as always, thanks for reading.

Dylan Ratigan's Health Insurance 101

Once again, Dylan lays the pimp hand down and calls on the insurance industry(and those who are too stupid to see what they are doing) to recognize. Here's how someone gets shit done and does so by calling out all those responsible REGARDLESS of party affiliation.


Why is health insurance the only business that has an exemption from the Sherman Anti-Trust Act other than Major League Baseball? If the delivery of taxpayer trillions by our politicians to the banks to support their fraudulently paid bonuses hasn't shown you what our current government's values are, check this link out.

Through the governmental negligence that we as voters allowed, a health care system was created in which a single health care company controls at least 30 percent of the insurance market in 95% of the country, including states like the following:

Maine, where Wellpoint controls 71% of the market.

North Dakota, where Blue Cross controls 90% of the market.

Arkansas, where Blue Cross Blue Shield controls 75% of the market.

Alabama, where Blue Cross Blue Shield controls 83% of the market.

This monopoly, combined with the misaligned incentives that trap people in employer-based health care, is causing the skyrocketing health care costs that are hurtling our nation towards bankruptcy.

I don't know what's worse: that most Republicans seem to be against ending this unfair legal protection for an entrenched industry that is ruining our country with their non-competitive practices, or that most Democrats seem to be threatening this arrangement only as a bargaining chip to push for a meaningless public option that wouldn't be accessible to almost 85% of the population?

Instead of improving our country, through creating and enforcing free and fair markets, our politicians are currently engaging in backroom deals, most of which protect the very companies who profit the most from these disastrous outdated systems -- industries like health insurance and big Pharma.

While we clearly have the ability as a group of 305 million to update the system that is American Health Care and move our country into the 21st century in the process, it's becoming clear that we may not have the leaders to do it.

Instead of seeking answers to the problem of paying for and providing medicine, we are doing the exact opposite. Taxpayers' money is being played with by politicians who are desperately trying to protect the competition-stifling, false security of the monopolistic employer-based health care system and its outdated, over-charging, under-delivering ways. Given the least consideration are those affected the most -- the patients and the doctors who care for them.

This country's founders built an ingenious system of checks and balances for a reason: to ensure that no special interest or group could use government power to commandeer the creative and economic wealth of our nation to their own ends. How much longer must we live in a country where the citizens are subservient to the banks, health insurance companies and any other special interest able to control our government at the expense of our the most basic principles of fairness, our future as a nation and, as a result, our freedom?


This is what you call responsible journalism at its best. Take that teabaggers, take it and reflect on it. Next time you feel like fighting to take your country back, why don't you take a more detailed look at those that organize you(and don't bother showing up themselves) and ask yourself, "what's my motivation, again?"

Socialize that ya bastards.


I am the Complaint Department Manager and I approve this lesson of the day.

I See Your "Children Singing About Obama" Video and Raise You One of George Bush

First things, first. Question: Is it possible to laugh yourself so hard that you shit your pants? Answer: Yes. Here is your proof:

Now most of you won't see the humor in this. I actually do. Why? Because this is what "holier than thou" individuals get when they're so pissed off about children singing the praises of Barack Obama('member that shit? Those were the fuckin' days). We all know it was Barack's idea for that too, yes? Of course it was. Just as G.W. is equally responsible for this..........whatever the fuck it is. Either way, I've seen both the Obama video and this piece of shit(speaking of shit, I actually like the G.W. one best, it works better than Metamucil and it's twice as funny to see it play out).

First dibs on cred goes to Annette for this enlightening moment.

I am the Complaint Department Manager and Annette is a Missouri Mule that I like.

Dylan Ratigan...Keepin' It Real.

Seems every time I see this guy interview someone, I find myself liking this guy more and more. From this clip, you can see exactly how lobbyists from the health insurance industry prove my point about them.

My point? That Insurance is just a greedy middleman industry. Insurance is not about making you healthier. It's about making someone like this douchebag, that Dylan Ratigan is attempting to interview, rich and in places of power that would make you cringe should you know the full extent of their reach. These assholes DELIBERATELY impose their will on you and place themselves between YOU AND YOUR DOCTOR. They are going to tell you what you can and can not do. What you can and can not make, and so fourth. I've said this many time before. I just love it when someone from the media helps me prove my point.



This douchebag Dylan outed here before your eyes goes to show that all they want is for us to keep fighting amongst ourselves with ridiculous rhetoric and inane squabbling about how we are turning into a communist or socialist country. Unfortunately, there are MANY who seem to buy into this. Why? Mainly because they are too stupid, scared and paranoid. They get this way because it's just easier to listen to someone they can identify with such as the likes of rush limbaugh or glenn beck. They also conveniently forget that there are websites out there(politifact, snopes, factcheck) that will help alleviate their fears, but then all the excitement would be gone and we can't have that now can we? After all, the cross is ready, gasoline jug is full, matches...check, LET'S PARTY!


I am the Complaint Department Manager and I approve the public option. DEAL!

DO NOT think for a minute the public option is dead!

In a surprising vote Tuesday, ten Democrats voted to add a public option to the most conservative of the five health insurance reform bills working their way through Congress. That's just two votes short of passage.

This robust support for the public option -- in what most observers consider the most conservative committee in the Senate -- signals a sea change in Congressional opinion toward the public option. The odds are now very high that some form of public health insurance option will be included on the final bill when it emerges from a House-Senate Conference Committee later this fall and is ultimately passed by Congress.

A Robert Woods Johnson Report indicates that over the last ten years wages have gone up 29%, health insurance rates have gone up 120% and the profits of the private health insurance industry have gone up 428%. No wonder insurance companies don't want competition!!

A public option in the market place will drive down the prices of premiums for private insurance. That, of course, is why the private insurance companies hate it. Insurance companies aren't seriously worried they will be forced out of business. They just don't want to cut their prices and profits.

The Congressional Budget Office has found that it will save the Government huge amounts in subsidy monies that it would otherwise have to pay to make more expensive for-profit plans affordable. The most robust version of the public option saves over $100 billion over ten years.

If you don't have a public option, Congress' only choice is either to cut subsidies that are the major means of providing affordability -- or they must raise more revenues. Given the massive need for affordability, and reluctance of many to raise taxes, the public option is looking better and better to many swing Democrats.


Sens. Harkin, Schumer and Rockefellar are speaking very positively tonight. They believe the bill will be on the presidents desk this year and it WILL have the public option! Don't believe the conservative pundits, they will be all over this story showing it in a bad light. What happened today was positive. A majority of this country wants the PO, and we will get it!

"The public option is on the march," Rockefeller said,

Now thats what I wanna hear!!

read more at Huffington Post


Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-creamer/growing-momentum-for-publ_b_303415.htmWhat are the reasons for the resurgent congressional support for the PO?? Well for one, voter support is as strong as ever, and two, members of congress will have to live with the consequences of what they pass for years to come.So what does this all mean?? This is a victory for dems today, don't be fooled by conservative pundits talk and there will be lots of it!! Though it's down, the public option is not out. "The public option is on the march," Rockefeller said.

what is the SEIU??

We are the Service Employees International Union, an organization of 2.1 million members united by the belief in the dignity and worth of workers and the services they provide and dedicated to improving the lives of workers and their families and creating a more just and humane society.

Find out more about the work we do:

» SEIU Healthcare
» Public Services
» Property Services

SEIU is the fastest-growing union in North America. Focused on uniting workers in three sectors to improve their lives and the services they provide, SEIU is:

  • The largest healthcare union, with more than 1.1 million members in the field, including nurses, LPNs, doctors, lab technicians, nursing home workers, and home care workers
  • The largest property services union, with 225,000 members in the building cleaning and security industries, including janitors, security officers, superintendents, maintenance workers, window cleaners, and doormen and women
  • The second largest public services union, with more than 1 million local and state government workers, public school employees, bus drivers, and child care providers



once more we have a comment from our friend lisa that was utterly embarrassing for her (I would hope!). So to you lisa, the next time you step foot outside your front door you are liable to encounter a member of the SEIU. You should be thanking them for the work they do because it most likely affects your daily life in one form or another!
Blogger lisa said...

The Public Option will do no more than feed the SEIU and other local unions who are made up of illiterate sub-standard government employees.

September 28, 2009 3:16 PM


I'm embarrassed for you lisa...

ComeAsYouAre ~ 25-27 September 2009


Some reflections from me on YouTube on how our teaching weekend has been so far. Will try to find a way of loading the slides here too if poss. Been great so far... And also (if that we're enough excitement!) here's the Back To Church Sunday 2009 promo video...

Been great so far!


Are You in Space Horror?

Netflix steals my time, and it has stolen my time in the form of a few movies of the space horror genre, such as Event Horizon and the animated Dead Space. I’ve seen aspects of space horror in other things as well. Even Firefly had a space horror episode.

I have decided to write a blog to the people of the distant future. Hopefully, this blog will still be around in a few decades/centuries in to help those who spacefarers know the signs of space horror and how to avoid common mistakes in responding to them.

That’s right people of the future: pay close attention to this blog. If you do, you won’t have to be the last surviving crew member, desperately repairing the distress beacon as the space demons close in, in the darkest corner of your once proud ship, which now drifts aimlessly through the black, vast, uncaring void of space.

Signs that you are in Space Horror!

You are on a gritty, dimly lit, and coldly metallic space vessel. Hey, I don’t judge why you signed on. Maybe there’s a lot of work found in mining asteroids. Maybe you got posted on a new military vessel. You might even make a living hauling cargo around in a used junker. It could even be the future has a completely different view of aesthetics than we do.

Nonetheless, ships like this are magnets for the space demons. I would suggest avoiding ships like this at nearly any cost. Maybe you should give up spacefaring and become a doctor like your father wanted. Who knows? Try to get aboard ships that look like they’d be a place you’d want to live. Look for sleek, brightly light interior designs and spacious cabins. The space demons never bother with those.

In fact, the only time you should get on a gritty, dimly lit, and junker-type space vessel is if it is crewed by an unlikely gang of adventurers who sail under the guidance of a gruff, but caring, space-captain. Ships like that are usually pretty safe, but avoid snooping around for cargo compartments.

Your ship finds a large, mysterious, and seemingly inanimate object someplace. Perhaps it is a giant monument covered with mysterious runes. It may be a beacon left by an ancient civilization. It may even be experimental technology from your own government. Nonetheless, you look to the obelisk with fear and trepidation.

But whatever it is leave it alone. Things like this are likely not inanimate. They could very well hold evil toxins or something similar that will turn you and crew into space demons/zombies/mutants or whatever. Go ahead and just note in your log and sail on by. You might even consider reburying it if you unearthed it. Don’t listen to the token science guy on the ship when he insists “we must stay here and study this for blah blah blah.”

You have found a crazy person or a crew member has gone crazy. Now here is something we’ve all seen. The doctor’s got some poor guy sedated, but he keeps needing more medicine. When he wakes up, he babbles incoherently. He might be saying, “they’re going to eat our bones” or “don’t open the gate! Don’t open the gate!!” He might even be trying to cut himself or attempt to escape via an empty air lock in a panic.

Chances are, this guy is probably about the most reasonable person on the entire ship right now. If he is saying things like “must escape, must escape” or the even more ominous “they’re coming back. Don’t let them come back” he –though crazy- is giving you very good advice. If he was a stranded survivor, leave wherever it was that you found him immediately. If he is your own crew member, leave whatever area he first started going crazy in. Don’t forget to quarantine him and run a thorough scan of your ship for toxins, viruses, or little tiny robots.

You have an annoying, science officer on your ship. This character believes that he is the voice of reason in any crisis. He is always the first to say “there must be a scientific explanation of all this” or maybe “now is not the time to panic.” As I alluded to earlier, he is the guy who insists that the mysterious objects or anything else must be studying or that we must wait for more data before doing anything.

Ignore this character. His role in the space horror is to remind everyone of the hubris of science against either superior science or the supernatural. Unless carefully reined in, this character will guide you and your ship to disaster. Be happy that he is often one of the first people the space demons will go for, but of course when the space demons are already eating major characters it might already be too late.

So there it is people of the future! Avoid space horror by following these steps and many others. I wish you the best in your space faring future. Now boldly go, and don’t do anything stupid!

Republicans are irrelevant....

Last night, Keith Olbermanns hour long show and this was my favorite paragraph spoken in the hour,

Jonathan Alter:

"Look, the Republicans at this point are basically irrelevant to the process. I know that sounds like a harsh and definitive thing to say, but they‘ve taken a hard right off the main highway of American politics. And Democrats don‘t need their votes. And whatever noise they make is ambient noise. It‘s not really relevant to how any of this shakes out."


Did ya get that?? IRRELEVANT!!! My thoughts exactly, nuf said...

What Have We Unlearned?

I’ll mope around the campus and I’ll feel betrayed, all those guilty summers I stayed. Then I’ll laugh that I feel for the lure of the pain of desire to feel so pure. And I’ll bear all the burdens of my little daily crimes. -Dar Williams “Teen for God”


It goes without saying that as we grow and learn we often find that the values we hold to are not the same values that we were taught when we were young. For most people, this stage of personal growth is either our internal acceptance of our parents’ values, the realization that we have rejected them, or somewhere in between. For quarter –life Christians, I think this process goes beyond what our parents taught us (if indeed, we learned anything from our parents at all) and expands to what our churches, especially our youth pastors, camp counselors and other leaders taught us. This kind of self-examination is especially strong at Christian Colleges, but is by no means limited to those places.

I have reflected on this, on and off, for years. I think it is time to hear what others’ also think on this subject. Many Christians I know tend to recognize the change and shift in their understanding of what Christianity is. For some, it is fairly benign reforming of and understanding of what Christianity is about. For others, it is a radical shift or complete recreation (and perhaps, rejection) of their faith.

In this blog, I am inviting anyone who is reading to share their own stories about this matter. I can frame it with two questions:

First, what is one thing about the Christian life that you learned between 15-20 that you either have either reformed or rejected now?

Secondly, if you could explain an alternative to your younger self (or to another 15-20 Christian), what would that alternative be?


These questions are intentionally open-ended. Here are some more thought-joggers.

-Movies and Entertainment. Some Christian traditions are incredibly extreme about this. I have heard of Christian Colleges in which students must use “code-words” to describe when they are going to see a movie. Likewise, there are often rules and ethics about the music we listen to. Are we supposed to privilege “Christian” music? If so what constitutes “Christian” music?

-Drinking, smoking and other forms of debauchery. Were you taught to not “smoke, drink or chew?” Was it careful advice to never touch liquor, hang out in a bar, or smoke a clove? What was the justification for this and did you find it acceptable or not?

-Sex and relationships. When dating, what kind of parameters were you expected to adhere to? Was dating a non-Christians off limits? Did you feel like you had to ask the “how far is to far” question? What kinds of things did you learn in the gender-specific message times? Do you still hold them today? Issues like homosexuality would definitely be under this heading.

-The Bible and Theological issues Is the Bible inerrant? Where did it come from? What was your perception of the Bible now as compared to when you were younger? What about the various theological issues? Some of us eventually disagree with some of the cornerstone doctrines of churches we were raised in. Opinions about hell/heaven, end-times, the understanding of “Kingdom of God,” and approaches to evangelism are only but a few.

Politics. Evangelicalism has traditionally been aligned with the political right, with only a minority aligning with the democrat party. We often learned about how our founding fathers were outstanding Christian men. Now, not all Christians believe this and some resist it quite strongly. Our faith is never divorced from our politics, but is it same as traditionally taught?

Naturally these are only a few of the things I can limit. You can use your own imagination and experience to expand on this. I hope I can get a lot of comments on this blog, as what is written here will be the substance of future blogs.

Feel free to submit whatever it is you have to say anonymously or sign your name.

Thanks for reading.

Michael Moore talks capitalism

Conservatives 'strongly dislike' Michael Moore. Hmmmm wonder why??
I think the guy is genius in what he brings to our attention with his films. He was on Larry King last night, talked about his visit there 20 yrs ago. He said the path General Motors was taking was leading to disaster. That was 20 years ago! He saw it, why didn't you? Here's a bit of what he said on that subject:

Moore: "And General Motors, that year, made a profit of $4 billion. And yet they had just laid off another 30,000 people. Now, why would you lay people off when you're making a record profit of $4 billion?

I mean that was totally insane. But they thought, well, you know, we can make a bigger profit. Maybe we can make $4.2 billion if we move those jobs to Mexico. And so they're always, you know, we can make a little bit more money if we do this. By firing those workers, Larry, they got rid of the very people who buy their cars."


He talks about capitalism, says the richest 1% in this country have more wealth than the total wealth of all the other 95% combined. He says capitalism is a failure:


Moore: "Yes. Capitalism. Yes. Well, I don't have to say it. Capitalism, in the last year, has proven that it's failed. All the basic tenets of what we've talked about the free market, about free enterprise and competition just completely fell apart. As soon as they lost, essentially, our money, they came running to the federal government for a bailout -- for welfare, for socialism. And I thought the basic principle of capitalism was that it's a sink-or-swim situation. And those who do well, the cream rises to the top and, you know, those who invest their money wrongly or, you know, don't run their business the right way, then they don't do well. Watch Moore talk about corporate greed Video

And if you run your business the wrong way, where does it say that you or I or anybody watching this has to bail them out?

I understand why everybody seemed to get behind it, because a lot of people were afraid, because these people down on Wall Street had taken our money and made bets with it. I mean, they essentially created this invisible virtual casino with people's money -- people's pension funds, people's 401(k)s. They took this money and they made bets. And then they made bets on the bets. And then they took out insurance policies on the bets. And then they took out insurance against the insurance -- the credit default swaps."


Say what you will about Moore, but this guy knows his stuff.

"There's no democracy in our economy" he says." You and I and the people watching have no say in how this economy is run. The upper 1 percent, the people down on Wall Street, the corporate executives, they're the people that control this economy."
King asks, "don't they want the economy to do well? Don't they want people to make money so they can buy their products. Do they want the people to be unemployed?" Moore says oddly enough, YES.


Moore: "Your employees are your biggest success. And, as you've noticed in the last few months, as the unemployment rate has gone up, so has the Dow Jones. Now, you'd think, you know, that Wall Street would respond with "Oh, my God, unemployment is going up, you know, this is bad for business." But the reality is, is that Wall Street likes that. They like it when companies fire people because immediately the bottom line is going to show a larger profit."


Damn people this guy makes more sense to me than all the jerks in Congress. Moore says the investor these days want the short-term quick profit, and they want it now. But in the long term what happens is what happened with General Motors as he described it 20 years ago.

You can read more on Moore on CNN.com


CDM wanted me to ad this link and article. I don't care what you all think, I think Moore is an all around genuine nice guy!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/24/michael-moore-calls-out-a_n_298605.html


Below is the first comment of 19 pages from the HuffPo Moore piece, most comments are pro Moore. Its a good article please click the link and read!

Michael Moore is a true American patriot who is fighting the good fight. He wants us to join him in the fight against the undue influence of corporate America on our democracy. He really cut to the chase with his observation about the "permalancers" at ABC. We have a whole new underclass in America of permanent temporaries who get no benefits.

posted Sep 24, 2009 at 13:51:16

blowhard Cantor

Cantor criticizes focus on health care

Courtesy:MSNBC.com

From NBC's Luke Russert

After a GOP caucus meeting today, House Minority Whip Eric Cantor argued that health-care reform was increasingly becoming a roadblock to Congress being able to address other important issues facing the country.


Cantor said, "Health care in this building has made it so that it seems we can't get anything else done. We have burning issues out there in this country. First and foremost, Americans want to see job security return; they want to see economic security return. Somehow, they are unable to deliver on that because of the intransigence on the majority's part on even discussing on ways for us to agree on health care.

He continued, "We have serious challenges as far as Afghanistan is concerned, that's being clouded by the rigidity by which this majority hangs on to H.R. 3200 [the House health-care legislation] and the imposition of a public option."


Can you believe this! Of course you can, if you are a lefty. This is disgusting, all the right can do is obstruct and cause delay, so get the hell to work you good for nothing bastards, then you can move on to other problems. Maybe whining and stomping your feet work with the wife but it won't work in Congress!!

Darren at Dissenting Justice has more on Cantor, pay him a visit!

TURN OFF YOUR DAMN TV!!!

Ripped from "The Economist" online edition.


Do I really have to explain this? I have told a certain...few to turn off the damn TV before and pick up a newspaper. Hell, make it a book. If you simply need the noise, there's always XM/Sirius. Just ask Sue, seems there's always something cranking in the background and it ain't Fox Noise.


I am the Complaint Department Manager and I approve of Headbanging as opposed to teabagging.

Jon Stewart Takes on Family Values Voters Sham...I Mean Summit

Moral Kombat
The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political HumorHealthcare Protests


So good, it needs no further comment...oh crap, I just did. Damn it!


I am the Complaint Department Manager and I approve this massage message. Sorry, Donna on the brain.

More Strange Sights and Sounds...

Though not necessarily all at the beach towns, here are some more visual phenomena of the last few weeks of note.

A huge guy and small lady dancing While blues dancing a few weeks ago, I saw the (ironically) one black guy in the room dancing with a petite Chinese woman. He actually had her doing some kind of hand-stand type deal. It was like a swing aerial in slow motion.

Crazy nutball doing Tai-chi one evening on Santa Monica blvd. It was late at night and I watched him with a friend from across the street. Both of us contemplated what it might mean for society to have to deal with a crazy guy like that. What does society owe to those who are... well nuts?

A Homeless Guy Outside of Ralph's who looked up hopefully at me and asked for change. He said he would work for it by helping me carry my groceries to my car. I was impressed. I let him do so and gave him a little bit of change from my car.

An LMU student wearing a "Republican" shirt. It had the republican logo with a bunch of dollar bills spilling out of its nose. The caption said "Republicans have more money" this is probably true, damn blatant, and funny.

This is good news for democrats!

Courtesy The Daily Kos:

Mayo Clinic issues statement supporting Obama's health plan

Mayo Clinic strongly supports President Obama’s call for health insurance reform and health care delivery reform, and agrees with the President’s position that the status quo is not acceptable. We believe that a bipartisan, collaborative approach is essential to achieving significant, patient-centered health care reform.

Mayo Clinic and the many organizations and individuals working with us in the Mayo Clinic Health Policy Center are strongly in favor of reform of both health care delivery and health insurance. True health care reform is getting better results for the money spent. Better results for money spent is what we meant by high value health care: better outcomes, safer care, better service and at lower costs over time. And this will translate to better access to medical services for all Americans.

We agree with President Obama’s focus on insuring all Americans and reforming the health care payment system.


  • In addition to posting its support for Obama's health reform plan, Mayo has added a link to an article on the Liberal Values site, titled: "Sarah Palin’s Lack of Understanding of Health Care."

Palin apparently does not realize that the waste and unwarranted subsidies which Obama referred to come from George Bush’s Medicare Advantage plans. This is yet one more example of Republicans governing incompetently and then using this history to make their argument that government is always incompetent.

The problem is not "the government that brought us" this waste but the Republican Party which brought us this waste. Without these Republican policies Medicare is far more efficient than private insurance at providing health care. The Republican policy of paying subsidies to private insurance companies costs 13% to 19% more to care for Medicare patients through private companies than it costs to care for them thorough the government Medicare program.

It is unusual for Mayo to take sides politically. The article also is critical of Ms. Palin's lack of understanding and expertise in health care issues.



Reconciliation??

Mitch McConnell: Severe reaction if reconciliation used


Senate Republicans issued a blunt warning to their Democratic colleagues today: Don’t even think about using reconciliation to ram through a health care bill.

Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told reporters that Democrats suffer a severe backlash if they used the procedural tactic, which would allow them to pass reform legislation with a bare 51 votes. This warning is not new – GOP leaders have gone so far as to call the use of this procedural maneuver a “nuclear” option – but McConnell renewed his warning amid reports that the Senate could still use reconciliation of they can’t win bipartisan support for health reform.

“Let me say…budget reconciliation has never been used to structure one-sixth of the American economy,” said McConnell. “If that option were chosen, there would be a severe, negative, and I think appropriate reaction from the American people.”

“If you thought the American people were upset in August, you haven’t seen how upset they will be if this device is chosen.”

McConnell acknowledged today that Republicans had in the past used reconciliation to pass tax cuts, but he said the large impact any health care package would have on the nation’s economy made any comparison unfair.

Majority Leader Harry Reid has said he is keeping open the option of using reconciliation, while stressing that he would rather pass a bill along less strictly partisan means.

Reid reiterated that message today – and lavished praise on Sen. Olympia Snowe, the moderate Maine Republican who finds herself in a prospective position of offering Democrats their 60th vote.

“I hope all Republicans follow her because she is a brilliant leader,” Reid said.



How dare those hypocrits! All they know how to do is obstruct and fear-monger. There is a majority of Americans who want this reform AND the public option. What you democrats should fear is a backlash from your constituents who put you in office because of your promise for healthcare reform, NOT fuckin do- nothing republicans!
Still lots more to come, I'll keep watching C-Span and crossing my fingers!

A new world (for me at least!) - video-blogging

St Albans welcomes a new Bishop

Bishop Alan Smith was welcomed as the tenth Bishop of St Albans on Saturday afternoon. The text of his sermon on that day follows below, but it can also be heard here.

I have high hopes for him and will be praying for him as I encourage all of you to do too.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Enthronement Sermon of the Rt Revd Dr Alan Smith as 10th Bishop of St Albans

The Feast of St Theodore of Tarsus 19th September 2009

Philippians 4. 7-13 and John 10. 7-16

speechcrest

Today the family of the Diocese of St Albans has gathered together here in this ancient Cathedral. From Bedford in the north to Barnet in the South; from Billington in the West to Buntingford in the East you have come to welcome me and I hope, to pray for me. Thank you for your warm welcome, which I find deeply reassuring. Last year I read Diarmaid MacCulloch’s book on the Reformation. He describes how Charles 1 imposed a new Prayer Book on the Scots. When the Bishop of Brechin led the service from the new book he had to take a pair of loaded pistols into the pulpit with him in case he was attacked by the congregation[1]. I am relieved to discover that your welcome has been more generous.

I feel hugely privileged to be your new bishop. Despite all the voices of doom and gloom, I want to give thanks for the Church of England. There is a church in virtually every community across the land. We have nearly 12000 clergy in parishes and chaplaincies; more than 1000 paid youth and children’s workers ministering alongside thousands of volunteers. There are over than 8000 Readers and Church Army officers, and more than 98,000 members of the Mothers Union. And let’s not forget our 4700 Church of England Schools with their dedicated teachers and staff who make such a huge contribution to our national life. We should also be proud of the £45m that Anglican parishes give away to charities every year. So three cheers for the good old C of E!

This Diocese also has much to give thanks for, with its long and distinguished history. Over the past three weeks I have visited Bedford Prison, the parish and the interfaith project at Queen’s Park in Bedford, Watford General Hospital, a nursery at Green Tye growing tomatoes, GlaxoSmithKlein at Stevenage, All Saints Academy in Dunstable and Wenlock Church of England School in Luton. I have been deeply impressed with the people I have met and the work I have seen. I am glad that representatives from those visits will be leading the prayers later in this service.

I welcome those here today from other world faiths. Thank you for coming. We are glad that you have joined us. I also want to thank God for the other Christian churches and denominations represented here, both from this country and from overseas. Thank you for all you do and for our partnership in the gospel. As I begin my ministry here I have come to listen and to learn and then to work with you as we discern God’s call to us for the future

I am acutely conscious that today we are living in a world gripped by anxiety. The media bombards us with an unending diet of fear:

v Daily reports about the recession and the yawning deficits in pension funds

v Concern about global warming

v Panic about the Swine Flu epidemic which might kill thousands of people this winter.

Yet in spite of the recession we are living in a time of prosperity undreamt of by our grandparents. Even though we have experienced decades of peace, even though medical breakthroughs and the wonderful care of the NHS are enabling us to survive longer than ever before, we are living in a deeply anxious age. Just under the surface, lurks fear. This is why Thomas Merton, the Trappist monk, asked ‘How do we live without anxiety in the midst of an age of anxiety?’

As I reflect on our service today and on the world in which we are living, let me share with you a vision, a challenge and a promise which are, I believe, especially relevant in an age of anxiety.

First, a vision – a vision which has three parts and which begins with going deeper into God.

We may feel that we are living in difficult times for the church. But there have been many periods in the past when the church has lived through challenging events. In the fourteenth century in Hertfordshire in a relatively short period over 50 clergy died of the plague. It puts our anxiety about Swine Flu into perspective. In 1538 Robert Hobbes the abbot of the Cistercian Abbey, just up the road at Woburn, and two of his monks were executed for opposing Henry the Eighth. Again it places the current debates in the Church of England into context. Even the most difficult PCC meetings today don’t usually end up in the vicar being taken out and shot, however tempting that might be. In the eighteenth and nineteenth century the church faced rapid growth in urban areas with their slums, their lack of schools and hospitals. All of these must have seemed like impossible challenges.

Sometimes in the faces of such overwhelming odds we lost our nerve, we retreated in fear and became self absorbed and irrelevant.

But there have been many other times in the past – glorious times - when Christians have risen to God’s challenge and opportunity: when in the midst of all the confusion, threat and fear we have gone deeper into God, we have put worship back at the centre of our corporate life, we have stepped out in faith and we’ve been captured afresh with a vision of a God who is a Good Shepherd.

Think for example

- of the Day of Pentecost, after the disciples had spent 40 days in prayer, the Holy Spirit came upon them and they began to worship and to share their lives. They scattered across the face of the ancient world with a message of love and forgiveness;

- or St Francis of Assisi and his little brothers in the 13th century embracing the poor for the love of God;

- or the rapid growth of the church in the Victorian period when clergy such as Father Charles Lowder moved into the slums with practical acts of care and compassion nurtured by worship and prayer

What enabled these ordinary men and women to do such extraordinary things? Their reckless altruism was inspired by the knowledge that they were in the hands of the Good Shepherd. These were people whose hearts and minds (and even their purses and wallets) had been grasped with a vision of a world shot through with the love of a God who pours out his life for the world, who lays down his life for the sheep. They went deeper into God.

The second part of the vision is that those men and women didn’t only go deeper into God but they transformed communities. There is a wonderful example of this in ancient records of the Emperor Julian in the fourth century. The Roman Empire had been Christian for about 50 years but Julian wanted to take it back to paganism. To do this he tried to set up charitable organizations to rival the Christians. In one of his letters he wrote ‘It is disgraceful that all men should see our people lack aid from us, when no Jew has ever had to beg, and the impious Galileans (that’s what he dismissively called Christians) support not only their own poor, but ours as well’. Around 400 AD we have records to show that the church in Antioch supported about 3000 virgins and widows and the church in Constantinople financed the care of 50,000 poor.

Although I have only just moved to St Albans I have already been hearing examples of similar self-giving love: the work of Open Door here in the city, a night shelter and day centre to help those who are homeless; in rural Bedfordshire a vestry which doubles as village shop[2], in Luton a big breakfast club[3] serving kids on their way to school; the holiday club for older people in Ware[4]; the Living Room project in Stevenage changing lives of people with addictions; in many of our town centres reaching out to young people through Street Pastors or Street Angels[5]

Might we become a church known for our overwhelming generosity and practical care? Can we be right there at the heart of the Millennium Development Goals, working for a world where children are not dying through lack of food or medicine? Can we be at the forefront of protecting the environmental? Can we, in the name of Christ, make a real difference?

But as well as going deeper into God, as well as transforming communities, the third part of my vision is to be a church which is passionate about making new disciples, not because we want to build a little empire, but because we have discovered the liberation and fulfilment in being a disciple – a follower – of Jesus Christ. In the words of the Book of Common Prayer collect ‘in whose service is perfect freedom’. Recently I met a young man who had come to faith a few weeks earlier from a totally agnostic background. ‘Why didn’t you tell me about the good news earlier? I feel as if I’ve suddenly come alive and I’ve got something to live for at last’.

My longing – my vision - is for a church where we are all going deeper into God, where we are transforming our communities and where we are making new disciples.

So far I have been sharing with you a vision. Now I want to share with you a challenge.

Such a church will not come about simply because of a mission strategy (although we do need one to underpin our work); it won’t come about through better organisation (although we need to plunder all the best contemporary insights to help us in our mission and ministry); it won’t come about by having more clergy (although I hope and pray that more people will hear God’s call to the priesthood); and it won’t come about by just having better equipped laity in their places of work and at leisure (although this is of vital importance).

It can only happen when we recapture the Christian way of laying down our lives for God and for each other. ‘I am the good shepherd’, said Jesus, ‘The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep’. It’s about putting God and putting others first. I am talking about nothing less than walking in the way of the cross.

If we were really willing to do that it will affect the way we welcome people to our Sunday worship, to baptisms or wedding or funerals. It will alter the way we open ourselves to the poor and the marginalised for each person is special and important. It will also affect the way we debate some of the issues which have been so divisive in the Anglican Communion. On all sides of these debates there are people who want to have ethnic cleansing, who want to exclude others and banish them. Can we at least treat each other as if we are receiving Christ himself? Can we draw inspiration from St Benedict, whose teaching was lived and prayed in this great Abbey church for hundreds of years by the monks that we should welcome and treat each person as if they were Christ?

I pray that God will raise up a generation of Christians who rediscover the power of the Cross of Christ.

Thirdly, having shared a vision and spoken about the challenge, there is also a promise. ‘I came’ said Jesus ‘that they might have life and have it abundantly’. Go into any bookshop on the High Street and you will find shelves of self-help books on how to find happiness. But Jesus Christ taught that happiness is not an end in itself. It is a bi-product. He tells us that we find our deepest and our truest humanity in knowing and being known by God. This abundant life comes through being in right relationship with God and with others: ‘I am the good shepherd. I know my own and my own know me, just as the Father knows me and I know the Father’.

We are living in an age which tends to reduce everything to measurable outcomes, so that education is judged solely in terms of exam results and health is measured by how many medical interventions are successful. In contrast the good news reminds us that the most important and the most valuable things in life are relationships. If you are not convinced, think about the frantic phone messages left by passengers in New York on that fateful day that’s come to be known as 9/11. They didn’t talk about money or their house or their holidays. Instead they spoke passionately and urgently of their love.

This is the most important thing that we have to attend to individually and corporately – knowing and loving God. It is the basis of our humanity, it is the bedrock of our personal faith, it is the foundation of all ministry and mission and it is the source of ‘abundant life’. It is because this is so important that my fellow bishops and I are calling on people across the diocese to join us next Lent with a special ‘Ch@llenge’. You will be hearing more about this in the next few weeks.

As your new bishop I long that we may be a church that does not give into the anxiety which is around us on all sides, but rather that we are grasped afresh with a vision of going deeper into God, which is transforming communities, which is making new disciples; a church that is responding to the challenge of walking in the way of the cross and which is discovering the reality of abundant life which is God’s promise and God’s will for us.

[1] MacCulloch, D. (2003) Reformation, p.522

[2] Cople

[3] St Hugh’s Lewsey

[4] Christ Church, Ware

[5] up and running in Watford, Hoddesdon, Broxbourne, Bishop’s Stortford, Stevenage, being developed in Dunstable, Bedford, Ware and Hertford


Confessing before God, and to you my Brothers and Sisters.

While reading blogs today, I stumbled upon a fascinating site. The site is entied Permission to Speak Freely. Apparently, it started back in 2008 when blogger Anne Jackson asked the question: what is one thing you cannot say in church?

It has since turned into a ongoing, online, project in which people will anonymously or publically submit a confession of things they feel they cannot say in church. Many of these are quite enlightening.

Allowing someone to confess is like allowing them to breathe. Guaranteeing grace is what allows someone to become good.

It's a great project.

“I Just read the Bible”

One thing that I continually come across in the world of the wired is a particular approach to Biblical interpretation. When confronted with the complexities of Christian tradition, contemporary issues, and of course hermeneutics, many Christians respond in a way that sounds incredibly pious. They might say something like this: I just believe what the Bible says. I take it literally. This may be expanded into a principle that says Take the Bible literally until you have to take it metaphorically.

This kind of approach is motivated by a sincere desire to be faithful to scripture. It is often supported by appeals that the Bible should be understood by the common man. The idea then is dispense with the “academic” hermeneutics and arguments about tradition and simply get into God’s word while the Holy Spirit is your guide.

As good as that may sound, it simply does not work. Here are a couple reasons why.

One of the problems, I think, is what it means to read the Bible “literally.” Literal often meant that this simply means “in the sense of the letter.” So if I read something literally, it means I read it according to its genre. Thus, a “literal” reading of the Bible will mean different things in different sections. The Gospels will not be understood like the psalms. Neither will Revelation be understood like the epistles. This is all done for the same reason that phonebooks are not understood like adventure novels.

What this means is that there may be metaphors within scripture and reading it “literally” will give you clues as to when something is metaphorical or not. Because of this, there is no simply dichotomy between “literal” readings and “metaphorical” readings. Interpretation is more complex than that and requires more background knowledge –knowledge that is surprisingly basic, but often ignored.

When I have seen people insist on taking the Bible literally, I think they really mean something else. Typically, taking the Bible literally is an attempt to read the Bible, only the Bible, and not have any “interference” from any kind of tradition, hermeneutic principle, 1st century Palestinian context or whatever. When people say they take the Bible “literally,” they are trying to say that they read the Bible with no hermeneutic or assumptions at all. Scripture, after all, is sufficient right?

It seems that a literal reading of passages like 2 Tim 3:16-17 indicate this: “All scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching for reproof, for corrections for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work.” Or how about Hebrews 4:12 “For the word of God is living and active and sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing as far as the division of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart.” (Other examples abound, such as Isegesis 24:7) Scriptures like these are often propped up to show that all we need to do is just read the Bible –hermeneutical tools/knowledge are therefore superfluous.

Both of these verses, by themselves, do not prove what is hoped for. Nonetheless, I think there is a stronger argument against the idea that we can, or should, read the Bible free of any kind of assumptions, tools or method, for interpretation.

A close look at some hard-to-understand verses might help. In look at these, we see that nobody reads the Bible so plainly. Here’s my favorite from John 6 (this is Jesus talking by the way).

I am the bread of life. Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. This is the bread which comes down out heave, so that one may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread that came down out of heaven; if anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever; and the bread also which I will give for the life of the world is My flesh. Then the Jews began to argue with one another saying, “how can this man give us his flesh to eat?” So Jesus said to them, Turly, truly I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood you have no life in yourselves.
John 6:48-53 NASB


What does the Bible literally say here? It means that we must eat of the Jesus’ flesh and drink his blood -literally. After all, it is not as if Jesus corrected their misunderstanding when the Jews restated what he just said. But the point I am trying to make is not one about the real presence of God via communion.

My point is this: Why do those who invoke 2 Tim 3:16 and others who want to “just believe the Bible” resist this so much? After all, if we can take 2 Tim 3:16 to support the sufficiency of scripture, without further discussion, why do people resist so strongly when someone else reads the Bible so plainly in John 6:53? It is because (like all Christians) they have assumptions, a hermeneutic, and an interpretive method, even if they deny it or are unaware of it.

There is another great example that I think literalists often stumble on. Luke 14:25-26
Large crowds were traveling with Jesus, and turning to them he said: 26"If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sisters—yes, even his own life—he cannot be my disciple. Luke 14:25-26 NASB


Again, no literalist thinks that being a disciple means we must hate our parents our children, or other members, of our family. Jesus didn’t literally mean that we should hate the sacred bonds of the nuclear family because….. well because why? Whatever reason someone offers to explain why Jesus meant something different is an appeal to some assumption or interpretative method. If a person does not believe hating the family is what Jesus meant, then they are denying the same “just read the Bible” approach that a equally plain reading of 2 Tim 3:16 was supposed to support.

There is no such thing as a “just read the Bible.” There is no taking it literally, so we can ignore all interpretative methods, traditions, etc. No one is free from assumptions when they read the Bible, no matter how hard they try. So what is common man to do?

My suggestion is similar to what the Reformers in Geneva thought. Then, they realized that the common man was illiterate. Their solution was, “let the Common man learn to read.” Today, the common man should learn to read well. Learning how to interpret the Bible is not some esoteric, mystical, discipline reserved for Monks on mountain tops or pipe-smoking scholars at Ivy leagues. It’s actually fairly simple. It does take time and a few resources, but considering the amount of books that flow thorough a Bible book store, I don’t doubt that anyone lacks the time or the resources to learn a little bit about reading the Bible well.

And I think it’s when we do that is when we really get to where the literalists hope to go.

Thanks for reading.

The Incident - the new album by The Porcupine Tree

My review from Amazon.co.uk: I joined the ranks of devoted fans of this band as Stupid Dream came out... and fell in love. I have liked the way that the Porcupine Tree's music has continued to progress through Lightbulb Sun, In Absentia, and Deadwing but I have to say that much of Fear of a Blank Planet left me cold. I was ambivalent about much of Nil Recurring...

Well, I am only on the 2nd listen through of The Incident. I have to say that musically this album tips it's hat back to the musical heritage of this underrated band. Long terms fans will enjoy looks back to the ambient influences of the (pre) Stupid Dream era. But in no way is this cd a nostalgic look back to the more Floydian era of PT.

As usual Steven Wilson and co also push their musical and lyrical horizons - with some delicate ambient soundscapes, gentle acoustic guitar, Beatles-esque harmonies, a bit of dirty grunge and crushingly heavy riffing.

This has to be their most complete work to date and shows off a band at the height of their powers.

Prog album of 2009? Definitely.

Album of 2009 - could well be...

Nuff said...

Below is a sampler video... hope it intrigues enough for you to explore further :-)

Teddy Bears' Picnic Service - 13th September 2009

40+ adults and kids has great fun in worship and a tea. Unadulterated joy. Fantastic!

Labor Day Weekend in Review.

In hindsight, I think I had a pretty rockin' labor day weekend.

Friday night was the meet 'n greet night for the new graduate students. There's nothing like drinking with your fellow students and your professors. It think this is by far one of the most interesting things about being a graduate student. I do this far more often in grad than I did in undergrad.

I met a few of the new students and re-connected with the other second years like myself. I especially liked meeting Valerie's boyfriend whose name I can't remember. He recommended to me some obscure BBC sci-fi series: truly, we are kindred spirits.

Saturday, I actually had nice productive day. I worked on comics, artwork, reading and re-reading. I sadly did not have the money to go bar-hopping with Valerie et al. I am, after all, trying to save cash. I am getting sick of going to places that try to separate me from my money anyway. Saturday evening I had the chance to meet with my roommate's parents and watch "Tropic Thunder" instead. That movie is awesome.

Sunday, I took one of the new students, Jenn, to Mosaic West LA. It is was an "experience." We later ate some chiptole and talked about our mutual, and fairly similar, experiences with evangelicalism. It seems that we both went to evangelical Christian colleges and found out that we weren't evangelicals by the time we left. (This is the price of being philosophers). I struggled to explain my reluctantly Keirkegaardian reasons for being involved at mosaic. I listened to her talk about her gripes about hell and sex. It was good meal.

Monday, labor day, I again worked on my comic all afternoon. About 2:00, Adam came over. We prepped meals for the night by shopping. We watched "Hackers" and reminisced about the 90s. Later, Josiah came over and brought some filler for the Vodka I had. I made some Vodka Collins' and White Russians with Soy milk from the fridge. Our conversations ranged from politics to religion to relationships in the most amicable and honest manner. It was an evening well spent.

What is the moral of the story? Well honestly, I think it might be this: I don't need to go out and drink anymore. Having been formally trained and practiced as a bartender, I can actually mix whatever I want. When I see the price of liquor, even good stuff, I realize that the mark-up to order a drink at a bar is obscenely high. Furthermore, I realize that the bar atmosphere is not actually conducive to what I want in a evening, which is good conversation maybe followed with some music if there is more than one musician around. I think from now on, I will arrange parties and shindigs in which I buy some Vodka, Rum, etc and ask others to bring the soda and the filler if we want to drink.

Seems a lot more fun that way.

Who do you say I am?


I am preparing Sunday's address, and reading Mark 8:27-38. As I have read I have been struck by how the dialogue between Jesus, the disciples and the crowd progresses.

Jesus begins asking the disciples who the crowd say he is. Then he asks the disciples themselves who they think he is. There is also from the beginning of this section, an assumption by Peter that Jesus is the Messiah. Peter is right, in a way...

The sort of Messiah that Jesus is one that flies in the face of what Peter and the Judaism of his day were expecting. The Messiah as a concept was a 'blank screen' onto which people could project their hopes and dreams.

The prevolant Messianic dream lying behind the Gospels and in the public mind at the time, was of a mighty militaristic leader, someone who with political and military might would remove Roman rule and introduce the Kingdom of God by force. Was this the Messiah that Peter proclaimed?

Jesus subtly switches the language he uses to describe himself from politically loaded 'Messiah'
to 'Son of Man' and Peter expresses the shock of a faithful generation - how could this Messianic Son of Man have his mission fail in suffering and death?

The question of Jesus' identity is not one though that can be simply answered with a 'this' or 'that.' We can only begin to answer the ultimate question through reading the accounts of Jesus' life, accounts which tell us much about Jesus' life, words and actions.

We have to keep coming back to the Gospels to understand who Jesus is because those accounts consistently challenge our assumptions of who Jesus is too. The Creeds need these stories to understand what it says we believe.

So why is Jesus so abrasive with Peter? Because the only people who have got Jesus' identity right in the Gospels are demons. Is Peter really on Satan's side? Only in the sense that Peter is trying to impose his vision of Messiahship on Jesus rather than watching, listening and learning from Jesus himself.

Everything hinges on this. If our lives and their landscapes are not shaped and reshaped by God and faith in Jesus as the Suffering Messiah, then we are not disciples of the Kingdom but of our own making. This is why to be a follower of Jesus, we are consistently challenged not just to leave our comfort zone and follow, but find our whole world challenged and reshaped as a cross.

Jesus asks who we say he is and we must answer for ourselves. Our answer will determine what sort of a disciple we are - not just ones that speak the truth about him, but who see Jesus for who who he really is and following him wherever he leads regardless of what we do or do not understand.

Melting Men

This installation, Melting Men, was meant to spotlight the World Wildlife Fund's warning that melting ice could possibly cause levels to rise more than 3.3 ft by 2100.

The warming of the Arctic will change weather in different parts of the world and increase the release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.

Dare I say, a sobering and yet chilling (couldn't resist it!) thought....

The Word as a Wordle

I am really excited to be preaching off this passage next Sunday, especially in the lead up to the 'Come As You Are' mission weekend. The reading is from Mark 8:27-38.

Below is the Wordle, and to the above is a still of Emergence by Bill Viola which seemed visually fitting...

Thoughts on the Case for Young Marriage

Christianity Today published an article on the case for young marriage. The author argues that in addition to teaching abstinence, Christianity needs to emphasize the virtues of marriage, specifically young marriage, to Christians. This is clearly a step in the right direction, but I have mixed reactions to the article.

For instance, the article cited that 80% of Christians have pre-marital sex. The author also admitted that "not all indulgers become miserable or marital train wrecks." It's nice of him to say so. There is however, an obvious implication here that is unaddressed in the article: of what value, then, is our abstinence culture? It seems that the promises of abstaining do not guarantee a good marriage and sex life later on. Likewise, pre-maritial sex does not curse one's later marital unions. The high statistic (80%) seems to make the abstinence culture as much of a sham as Sarah Palin's views on sex-education while bumbling to explain her pregnant 17-year old daughter. Maybe I'm harsh, but I know I can't be the only one thinking, "the Emperor has no clothes."

Nonetheless, the author advocates that teaching young people about what marriage is and what it is not. This, I think is a great idea. I have known many young marriages that have turned out beautifully, despite the economic and social hardships that he lists. Yes, getting married young, in many cases, is a still a good idea.

On the other hand, I am also old enough to have known more than a few divorced friends. This is not an issue to be taken lightly. One friend feels like he was simply "following a script" when he was married at 20. Another peer and his spouse where not emotionally or financially ready for the commitment -even despite the idea of marriage as formative institution. I could list a few more, but the examples need not be multiplied. The authors knows well that young marriage correlates with divorce. He is also right to point on that this is not a casual connection.

But in answering objections, I still have some questions -especially economics. The author is right that we have set a higher-than-realistic economic standard for both weddings and young marriages. I also think that he is right that helping young marriages economically is something that Christians ought to be doing. If more established people see new married couples in need of some kind assistance, providing that assistance should be the norm not the exception -if we truly believe it is as important as we claim.

However, I still don't think that the economic concerns can be so easily overcome. The author writes from Texas, and the situation may be very different out there. I live in Los Angeles. Very, very, few people I think, are established enough to be married here by their early twenties. Putting off marriage to either establish oneself in your career or to pursue more education is, I think, I very smart decision for many people. This kind of thinking is further exacerbated by the economic outlook of my generation. Many of us know that government services like Medicare are not going to be there for us in the future. We are also keenly aware of the high cost of raising children. These are all legitimate concerns and are completely justifiable reasons to delay marriage.

Finally, there was something that the article did not address: that the divorce rate is slightly higher among evangelicals than it is in the general populace. It very likely the lack of teaching about marriage, which the author advocates, that causes this. The consequences of the present circumstance are dire however. I think many young Christians put off marriage because they see less value to it. Why push marriage on ourselves if our ideas about marriage came from the discontent unions of many of our parents, the divorces of our relatives, or even the divorces of our peers? I do not mean to denigrate the institution. I think marriage is a good thing. But if it is the intention of older Christians to inspire younger Christians to be married, then the older generation must understand that many of the young are disappointed with the institution and why.

Ecce Homo

I am struck by this Sunday's gospel reading from Mark 7, it is one of my favourites. There are many things that one could pick up on and run with as a preacher.


There are obviously the healing themselves and this Gospel might lead to a sermon about healing, and yet what could one say? Jesus is sought by this non-jewish woman thinking she has found the local healer, hence Jesus' exchange with her. He was probing to see if there was any substance to her question. In other words did she just have selfish motives or did she understand that Jesus' ministry was far more that that of a healer.


Then there is the healing of the deaf man. Jesus seems to act strangely too. Jesus is begged to heal this man. The people with him, maybe him too, again clearly see him only as a healer. Perhaps that's why Jesus takes the man away to a private place to heal him. Is it a PR exercise?


Jesus orders the man to tell no-one bout the healing. Putting the healing into that context, it becomes clear that Jesus is concerned about who people perceive him to be? A healer only or the Messiah, the Son of God? Here as elsewhere, the healing miracles performed by Jesus point not at him, but beyong him to God and his coming Kingdom.


As I prepare I am left with some questions:

  • Other sermon threads to follow would be racism (reference to 'the dogs'), transformation (who was changed - the woman's daughter? The deaf man? Jesus himself as he is challenged by a Gentile.)
  • Who did people in Jesus day really think he was - see Simon Peter's confession in Matthew 16:16
  • Who do people today think Jesus was? A historical figure? A story like the Tooth Fairy?
  • Who do I say he is? How would I explain what I believe?
  • What difference does it make for Jesus to be so much more than a healer?
  • What's Jesus actually offering?
Ping your blog, website, or RSS feed for Free